Monthly Archives: August 2010

Reason on the offensive: the return of the Enlightenment

That is the heading of a recent piece in The Weekend Australian newspaper by Luke Slattery, an experienced reporter and editor on education, arts and letters. He has  been a sympathetic but critical commentator on postmodernism (sympathetic, like myself, in the sense of being prepared to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

CR Scholar 4:Michael Giffin

Michael Giffin is a US-born scholar and editor, based in Sydney.  Well versed in philosophy and hermeneutics from Aristotle to the present, his special research interest is the nineteenth and twentieth century novel in English that interrogates classical metaphysics from a neoclassical, … Continue reading

Posted in CR scholars | Leave a comment

CR Scholar 3: Jack Birner

Jack Birner, né en 1951, a étudié les affaires commerciales et administratives internationales à Nijenrode-Breukelen, aux Pays-Bas. Puis, il s’est orienté vers l’économie et la philosophie à l’université d’État du Michigan (BA en 1972). Il a commencé des études de … Continue reading

Posted in CR scholars | 1 Comment

Popper, Smith and the Aristotelian/Austrian program

The purpose of  this note is to sketch the similarities between the metaphysical framework that Barry Smith identified as the framework for Carl Menger’s economics and the framework that Popper developed in debate with the physicists. Smith’s story is summarised … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Education reform in Vienna and its impact on Popper

A new entry on Otto Neurath in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has some fascinating historical material on the education reform movement in Vienna and the way this involved the philosophers and psychologists and impacted on Popper. Karl Buhler was a key person, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

James Garvie on Popper

James Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books  Continuum, London 2006 The authors of the 20 greatest books are Aquinas, Aristotle, Ayer, Berkeley, de Beauvoir, Descarates, Hegel, Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Locke, Marx, Mill, Neitzsche, Plato, Popper, Rousseau, Sartre, Schopenhauer and Wittgenstein. “Popper … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Gene Callahan digs in

Gene Callahan has kicked off quite a debate with his post on evolutionary epistemology that was noted the other day. There are now over 80 comments. His main point seems to be that EE provides no “warrants” for knowledge approaching … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Critical Rationalism in a Nutshell

This thought has been hovering around in my mind for a while. It seems to me the core of the critical rationalist mindset. We create our problems by choosing our ends, and we can dissolve them just by changing our … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

A more critical view of Alan Chalmers on Popper

Alan Chalmers wrote a sensationally successful introductory book on the philosophy of science. What is this thing called science? first appeared in 1976 with revised editions in 1982 and 1999. Translated into fifteen languages it became a bestseller and a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Stanford Encylopedia Criticisms

This is a follow up to Rafe’s post The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy vs Karl Popper in which I reply to the Encyclopedia’s criticism of Popper’s position. Continue reading

Posted in epistemology, science | 5 Comments