-
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Book on synergy of Popper and the other Austrians
- Jeffrey C Alexander and the logic of sociological research
- Standard misrepresentations and invalid criticisms of Popperism
- Giddens on Popper and positivism
- Major Popper biography in progress
- Peter Boettke on 1985 as a defining year for Austrian economics
- Rethinking climate change
- Evidence
- Objective and Objectivist Dogmas
- New CR site to watch!
Recent Comments
- Alex Naraniecki on articles of interest
- Musiitwa Jean Baptiste on Karl Popper’s nine theses concerning epistemology
- Rafe on Book on synergy of Popper and the other Austrians
- Lee Kelly on Book on synergy of Popper and the other Austrians
- Rafe on Philip Mirowski on Popper and the Mont Pelerin Society
- George Balanchine on Philip Mirowski on Popper and the Mont Pelerin Society
- George Balanchine on Philip Mirowski on Popper and the Mont Pelerin Society
- Matt on Some notes on rationality
- Dee on Some notes on rationality
- Rafe on Evidence
Archives
-
books
Category Archives: logic
Does Science Presuppose the Existence of Regularity in Nature?
A popular criticism of Popper’s scientific method is that he “smuggled induction in through the back door.” Contrary to claims of having done away with it altogether, Popper’s proposed method of science actually presupposes induction. Therefore, critics argue, Popper failed … Continue reading
Posted in logic, science
18 Comments
Critical Rationalism vs. Inductive and Subjective Interpretations of Probability
So I am trying to understand the critical rationalist arguments against the inductive and subjective interpretations of probability. I am not all that familiar with the matter, and so I have likely made some elementary mistakes — feedback is appreciated. … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, logic
73 Comments
A Pancritical Paradox?
In Retreat to Commitment, Bartley characterises a pancritical rationalist as one who, holds all his positions, including his most fundamental standards, goals, and decisions, and his basic philosophical position itself, open to criticism; one who protects nothing from criticism by … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, logic
4 Comments
Why is the study of deduction important to critical rationalism?
This is a response to a post that was made last May in this blog by Elliot and can be found here. I’m making this a post as opposed to a comment in an attempt to renew interest in this … Continue reading
Posted in logic
28 Comments
Review: Popper, Otto Selz and the Rise of Evolutionary Epistemology by Michel ter Hark
“Popper, Otto Selz and the Rise of Evolutionary Epistemology” by Michel ter Hark is historically interesting and philosophically provocative. Continue reading
Posted in biology, epistemology, evolution, logic, science
61 Comments
You Tube 1
I have made some You Tube videos on critical rationalism, probability and logic.
Posted in epistemology, logic
6 Comments
Popper on epistemological naturalism
This is a quote from Popper in Logic of Scientific Discovery, Section 10: This view, according to which methodology is an empirical science in its turn—a study of the actual behaviour of scientists, or of the actual procedure of ‘science’—may be described … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, logic, quote, science
1 Comment
Criticism of Salmon on Popper
Wesley Salmon wrote a critique of critical rationalism in which he claimed this it could not explain why it is rational to use the predictions of scientific theories to help us make decisions. First, note that Salmon does not and … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, logic, science
67 Comments
Karl Popper on logic of falsification
The falsifying mode of inference here referred to — the way in which the falsification of a conclusion entails the falsification of the system from which it is derived — is the modus tollens of classical logic. It may be … Continue reading