-
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Book on synergy of Popper and the other Austrians
- Jeffrey C Alexander and the logic of sociological research
- Standard misrepresentations and invalid criticisms of Popperism
- Giddens on Popper and positivism
- Major Popper biography in progress
- Peter Boettke on 1985 as a defining year for Austrian economics
- Rethinking climate change
- Evidence
- Objective and Objectivist Dogmas
- New CR site to watch!
Recent Comments
- Alex Naraniecki on articles of interest
- Musiitwa Jean Baptiste on Karl Popper’s nine theses concerning epistemology
- Rafe on Book on synergy of Popper and the other Austrians
- Lee Kelly on Book on synergy of Popper and the other Austrians
- Rafe on Philip Mirowski on Popper and the Mont Pelerin Society
- George Balanchine on Philip Mirowski on Popper and the Mont Pelerin Society
- George Balanchine on Philip Mirowski on Popper and the Mont Pelerin Society
- Matt on Some notes on rationality
- Dee on Some notes on rationality
- Rafe on Evidence
Archives
-
books
Author Archives: Elliot
The Most Important Improvement to Popperian Philosophy of Science
David Deutsch is the best Popperian after Popper. Here’s one reason why.
Posted in Uncategorized
6 Comments
David Deutsch on Respect for Right and Wrong
From the Taking Children Seriously email list (now located here) Someone wrote on 17/1/01 7:10 pm: Earlier I wrote asking about the TCS understanding of the word coercion.I appreciate all the comments that came back and I think I have … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Anti-Discrimination Laws
Some interesting discussion about anti-discrimination laws here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1375774 (The posts by xenophanes are me.) Excerpt: Fundamentally, it’s irrational to force people who disagree with you to do things your way if they don’t see why it’s best — to make … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
2 Comments
Deduction is a Mistake
Deduction is a bad idea which Popper accepted. The idea is that certain arguments are “deductively valid”. A valid argument is one such that if the premises are true then the conclusion MUST be true. Deduction thus has an anti-fallibilist … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
14 Comments
Popper and the Social Sciences
Rafe discussed “Popper’s legacy in economics and the social sciences”. The most important principle of this sort is that disagreements should be resolved rationally. That means we do not assume which idea is right, especially not based on attributes of … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Popper Interview about God
Popper Interview Popper says “I don’t know whether God exists or not.” and ” I do think that all men, including myself, are religious.” Also “I would be glad if God were to exist, to be able to concentrate my … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Corroboration
When we corroborate a theory (i.e., it passes tests), the theory is better in some way. This is a dangerous statement because being better sounds like it’s more supported. The way it’s better is this: it is now harder to … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
Leave a comment
Best Survives Criticism
David Deutsch wrote: He chose ‘two years’ because it survived this criticism best of all the propositions he chose. What does this mean? How can a theory partially survive criticism?
Posted in epistemology
3 Comments
Comments on Mises and Gordon on Popper
Rafe wrote: In a nutshell, Popper shifted the focus from the justification of beliefs to the formation of critical preferences for publicly articulated (objective) theories. Care to offer a defense of critical preferences from my criticism? Context Criticism
Posted in Uncategorized
59 Comments
Critical Preferences and Strong Arguments
Following up on my post about critical preferences, I have written a criticism of them and an alternative view. I posted it on my website. Please feel free to comment or reply here.
Posted in epistemology
Leave a comment