-
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Popper on persisting with problematic theories
- On Murphy, Callahan, the Problem of Induction, and Psychologism
- Popper on social engineering
- “Theory and Reality” by Peter Godfrey-Smith
- Not meeting Bill Bartley
- Reading guides
- Bartley on justificationism (again)
- The Popper Web Lives!
- Book on synergy of Popper and the other Austrians
- Jeffrey C Alexander and the logic of sociological research
Recent Comments
- Browsing Catharsis – 05.09.12 « Increasing Marginal Utility on On Murphy, Callahan, the Problem of Induction, and Psychologism
- Rafe on On Murphy, Callahan, the Problem of Induction, and Psychologism
- Happy birthday Peter Klein, F A Hayek and Joe Agassi at Catallaxy Files on people of interest
- Guest Post: Lee Kelly on Callahan on Popper « Increasing Marginal Utility on Does Science Presuppose the Existence of Regularity in Nature?
- Browsing Catharsis – 04.25.12 « Increasing Marginal Utility on Does Science Presuppose the Existence of Regularity in Nature?
- Elliot Temple on “Theory and Reality” by Peter Godfrey-Smith
- Bruce Caithness on Standard misrepresentations and invalid criticisms of Popperism
- Quackbuster on Standard misrepresentations and invalid criticisms of Popperism
- Elliot Temple on Why scientists like Popper
- Parker Whittle on Standard misrepresentations and invalid criticisms of Popperism
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
-
books
Author Archives: Alan Forrester
Epistemology and the laws of physics
I’ve written a paper that uses evolutionary epistemology to solve a problem in the foundations of physics: explaining the second law of thermodynamics.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Scientism vs Liberalism
In his book, “The Counter-Revolution of Science”, Hayek argued against scientism – attempts by the social sciences to ape the methods of the natural sciences by ignoring the subjectivity of economic value. I will apply these ideas to criticise of some current ideas that the government should use force to make people happier. Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, ethics, open society
10 Comments
Howson on Deutsch
In Chapter 7 of his book The Fabric of Reality, David Deutsch has a dialogue in which he discusses critical rationalism with a crypto-inductivist, a philosopher who thinks there is an induction shaped hole in his worldview although he agrees … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, science
Leave a comment
Utopianism, Libertarianism and Other Political Theories
In Chapter 9 of Volume 1 of The Open Society and Its Enemies, Popper argues against utopianism. I have heard many people say that libertarianism is utopian. For example, in this series of videos the speaker often states or implies … Continue reading
Posted in open society
2 Comments
Popper on Schools and Universities
It has been said, only too truly, that Plato was the inventor of both our secondary schools and our universities. I do not know a better argument for the optimistic view of mankind than the fact that this devastating system of education has not utterly ruined them. Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, ethics, open society, quote
9 Comments
Who Should Decide?
Popper points out that it is difficult to find a government on whose goodness and wisdom we can rely and so that we should set up our institutions to allow us to prevent bad government from doing too much damage. Many people seem unaware of this argument and its implications for political and moral philosophy. Continue reading
Posted in ethics, open society
4 Comments
The Myth of the Framework
The Myth of the Framework is an essay Popper wrote that was published in the book of the same title. The point of the essay is that relativists tend to set excessively high standards for making progress. I would add that this is not just a problem for relativists: it is is a very widespread and extremely damaging obstacle to intellectual and moral progress. Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, ethics
28 Comments
Optimism vs Faith
In the debate between those who think the human species is doomed due to this or that environmental problem and those who are more optimistic, one often gets the impression from pessimistic environmentalists that optimism is motivated solely by faith. In … Continue reading
Posted in historicism, open society
30 Comments
Disagreement vs. Justificationism
Justificationists often complain that Popper’s philosophy doesn’t enable us to pick out one scientific theory as being decisively the best at any particular time. But there is something extremely odd about this objection. Critical rationalists advocate various restrictions on what … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, science
20 Comments
Stanford Encylopedia Criticisms
This is a follow up to Rafe’s post The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy vs Karl Popper in which I reply to the Encyclopedia’s criticism of Popper’s position. Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, science
5 Comments