The most important works of 20th century philosophy (perhaps)

Stephen Hicks has posted a link to a survey of US philosophers to find out  how they ranked the books and articles of the 20th century.

Using the Philosophers’ Email Directory, we mailed our questionnaire to 5,000 teachers of philosophy. About 1,000 emails bounced back for mis-typed or obsolete addresses, 4,000 reached their targets. We received 414 survey replies, a healthy response rate of better than 10%. Since there are about 10,000 teachers of philosophy in North America, we had replies from 4% of the entire profession. At a confidence level of 80%, the survey has an error rate of plus or minus 3%, assuming that we reached a demographically representative group.

Not a very inspiring result. The Logic of Scientific Discovery just scraped in at equal 25th.

The top ten books cited:
wittgenstein1. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations [179 citations]
2. Heidegger, Being and Time [134]
3. Rawls, A Theory of Justice [131]
4. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [77]
5. Russell & Whitehead, Principia Mathematica [64]
6. Quine, Word and Object [63]
7. Kripke, Naming and Necessity [56]
8. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions [51]
9. Sartre, Being and Nothingness [38]
10. Whitehead, Process and Reality [34]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The most important works of 20th century philosophy (perhaps)

  1. Oh well. I bet Hicks feels worse about “The Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology”‘s placing…:-)

  2. Frank Lovell says:

    I’d cry out in anguished frustration, if doing so weren’t so undignified.

    Ah, what the heck, nobody else is home right now, I think I will anyhow…


  3. Bruce Caithness says:

    Wittgenstein was not the only philosopher who could command aphorisms.
    Popper’s “The Two Fundamental Problems of the Theory of Knowledge” (2009) originally published in German 1979 from a collection of drafts and preliminary work from the years 1930 to 1933 for his first published book Logik der Forschung (1934):

    1.Problem of induction (Hume’s problem) : “Can we know more than we know?”

    2. Problem of demarcation (Kant’s problem) : “When is a science not science?”

    One might suggest with respect to 1. we can conjecture without claiming we know more than we know.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 + = eleven

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>