Monthly Archives: August 2010

The unassailable and definitive thoughts of Wittgenstein

Wittgenstein is credited with the distinction of triggering not just one but two revolutions in philosophy,  however it is important to note that they both led his followers into dead ends. Peter Munz wrote a really good book on the superiority … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Criteria for the CR scholar award

Just in case people were wondering, the criteria for the CR scholar are more or less the same as those for the Rhodes Scholarship. literary and scholastic attainments; energy to use one’s talents to the full, as exemplified by fondness … Continue reading

Posted in CR scholars | Leave a comment

A C Grayling (ed) Philosophy 1.

“the missionary possibility immediately suggested itself of promoting the university’s conception of what is central to philosophical study. This volume is the result.” The object of this investigation is to find where the thoughts of Popper and critical rationalism stand … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A C Grayling, a very model of a modern public intellectual

“Analytic philosophy is not so much a school of thought as a style or method. It is a style of philosophizing which seeks to be rigorous and careful…” A C Grayling  A C (Anthony) Grayling (1949 – ) is the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CR Scholar 6: Peter Klein

The trigger for this award is a new course on Austrian economics that Peter has designed for PhD students. Peter Boettke has given this a big rap. His latest book is a collection of essays on entrepreneurship and this Wik … Continue reading

Posted in CR scholars | 3 Comments

CR Scholar 5: Karl Popper

This award is designed to encourage the living rather than remember the dead and forgotten but a nice little paper by Karl Popper came to mind while I was writing about Grayling’s views on science. Karl Popper was a little-known Austrian-born … Continue reading

Posted in CR scholars | 2 Comments

A C Grayling posing problems that are solved by CR

Some comments on  What is Good? by A C Grayling (2003). The bottom line: The issues in moral philosophy that he broached have been left unresolved, with favourable handwaving in the direction of science and negative handwaving in the direction of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Was Mises a Fallibilist?

I have been reading Human Action and decided to share some thoughts. Mises is troubling for a critical rationalist. Some of Mises’s proclamations seem adamantly anti-fallibilist, and appear to have been interpreted by many of his followers as such. Here … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

More on the advance of reason: Two theories of democracy

Picking up some more points from Luke Slattery’s piece which was noted yesterday. One of the heroes of the article was the philosopher A C Grayling. Another hero of the piece is democracy. So the virtues of rationality, free speech, liberty and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Most Important Improvement to Popperian Philosophy of Science

David Deutsch is the best Popperian after Popper. Here’s one reason why.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments