-
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Popper on persisting with problematic theories
- On Murphy, Callahan, the Problem of Induction, and Psychologism
- Popper on social engineering
- “Theory and Reality” by Peter Godfrey-Smith
- Not meeting Bill Bartley
- Reading guides
- Bartley on justificationism (again)
- The Popper Web Lives!
- Book on synergy of Popper and the other Austrians
- Jeffrey C Alexander and the logic of sociological research
Recent Comments
- Browsing Catharsis – 05.09.12 « Increasing Marginal Utility on On Murphy, Callahan, the Problem of Induction, and Psychologism
- Rafe on On Murphy, Callahan, the Problem of Induction, and Psychologism
- Happy birthday Peter Klein, F A Hayek and Joe Agassi at Catallaxy Files on people of interest
- Guest Post: Lee Kelly on Callahan on Popper « Increasing Marginal Utility on Does Science Presuppose the Existence of Regularity in Nature?
- Browsing Catharsis – 04.25.12 « Increasing Marginal Utility on Does Science Presuppose the Existence of Regularity in Nature?
- Elliot Temple on “Theory and Reality” by Peter Godfrey-Smith
- Bruce Caithness on Standard misrepresentations and invalid criticisms of Popperism
- Quackbuster on Standard misrepresentations and invalid criticisms of Popperism
- Elliot Temple on Why scientists like Popper
- Parker Whittle on Standard misrepresentations and invalid criticisms of Popperism
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
-
books
Monthly Archives: August 2010
The unassailable and definitive thoughts of Wittgenstein
Wittgenstein is credited with the distinction of triggering not just one but two revolutions in philosophy, however it is important to note that they both led his followers into dead ends. Peter Munz wrote a really good book on the superiority … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Criteria for the CR scholar award
Just in case people were wondering, the criteria for the CR scholar are more or less the same as those for the Rhodes Scholarship. literary and scholastic attainments; energy to use one’s talents to the full, as exemplified by fondness … Continue reading
Posted in CR scholars
Leave a comment
A C Grayling (ed) Philosophy 1.
“the missionary possibility immediately suggested itself of promoting the university’s conception of what is central to philosophical study. This volume is the result.” The object of this investigation is to find where the thoughts of Popper and critical rationalism stand … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
A C Grayling, a very model of a modern public intellectual
“Analytic philosophy is not so much a school of thought as a style or method. It is a style of philosophizing which seeks to be rigorous and careful…” A C Grayling A C (Anthony) Grayling (1949 – ) is the … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
CR Scholar 6: Peter Klein
The trigger for this award is a new course on Austrian economics that Peter has designed for PhD students. Peter Boettke has given this a big rap. His latest book is a collection of essays on entrepreneurship and this Wik … Continue reading
Posted in CR scholars
3 Comments
CR Scholar 5: Karl Popper
This award is designed to encourage the living rather than remember the dead and forgotten but a nice little paper by Karl Popper came to mind while I was writing about Grayling’s views on science. Karl Popper was a little-known Austrian-born … Continue reading
Posted in CR scholars
2 Comments
A C Grayling posing problems that are solved by CR
Some comments on What is Good? by A C Grayling (2003). The bottom line: The issues in moral philosophy that he broached have been left unresolved, with favourable handwaving in the direction of science and negative handwaving in the direction of … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Was Mises a Fallibilist?
I have been reading Human Action and decided to share some thoughts. Mises is troubling for a critical rationalist. Some of Mises’s proclamations seem adamantly anti-fallibilist, and appear to have been interpreted by many of his followers as such. Here … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
5 Comments
More on the advance of reason: Two theories of democracy
Picking up some more points from Luke Slattery’s piece which was noted yesterday. One of the heroes of the article was the philosopher A C Grayling. Another hero of the piece is democracy. So the virtues of rationality, free speech, liberty and … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
The Most Important Improvement to Popperian Philosophy of Science
David Deutsch is the best Popperian after Popper. Here’s one reason why.
Posted in Uncategorized
6 Comments